<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Training &#038; world views</title>
	<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2007/training-world-views</link>
	<description>Information architecture, interaction design and much more</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donna Maurer</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2007/training-world-views#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Maurer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2007/training-world-views#comment-736</guid>
		<description>I always do the visual/auditory/kinesthetic thing. It is not enough - by far. All it does is stop a proportion of the audience from sleeping.

And 'write to your audience' (teach/design for your audience) makes logical sense, but doesn't usually turn into anything practical without additional work.

The Lakoff frames/culture idea fits, but the message in this book is that it is more individual than culture. Culture is too broad - paying attention to the frames of individuals (and patterns of frames) is the important thing...

The worldview/frame concept is one very good way to remember what it is about individuals in the audience that affects how we communicate/teach/write/design to.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always do the visual/auditory/kinesthetic thing. It is not enough - by far. All it does is stop a proportion of the audience from sleeping.</p>
<p>And &#8216;write to your audience&#8217; (teach/design for your audience) makes logical sense, but doesn&#8217;t usually turn into anything practical without additional work.</p>
<p>The Lakoff frames/culture idea fits, but the message in this book is that it is more individual than culture. Culture is too broad - paying attention to the frames of individuals (and patterns of frames) is the important thing&#8230;</p>
<p>The worldview/frame concept is one very good way to remember what it is about individuals in the audience that affects how we communicate/teach/write/design to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Boyd</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2007/training-world-views#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2007/training-world-views#comment-735</guid>
		<description>Hi Donna,

it sounds to me like Seth has read Lakoff :) Lakoff's "different cultures frame things differently" becomes Seth Godin's "people relate to the worldview that supports them" and even Stephen King's "Write to your audience, everything else is bull".

I think that it goes way beyond the visual/auditory/kinesthetic learner divisions (although these are a good start).

Cheers, Andrew
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Donna,</p>
<p>it sounds to me like Seth has read Lakoff <img src='http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Lakoff&#8217;s &#8220;different cultures frame things differently&#8221; becomes Seth Godin&#8217;s &#8220;people relate to the worldview that supports them&#8221; and even Stephen King&#8217;s &#8220;Write to your audience, everything else is bull&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think that it goes way beyond the visual/auditory/kinesthetic learner divisions (although these are a good start).</p>
<p>Cheers, Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
