<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being brave &#038; usability testing</title>
	<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2007/being-brave-usability-testing</link>
	<description>Information architecture, interaction design and much more</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Ellison</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2007/being-brave-usability-testing#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 00:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2007/being-brave-usability-testing#comment-780</guid>
		<description>It is a brave thing to get our work looked at for feedback, and many people still don't do that.

I agree with your statements about the human angle of usability testing. I've been hearing a lot of feedback from 'client' teams (i.e. teams receiving the usability report) over the past few years about how much of an attack the usability report tends to seem (even if it was never intended to be an attack). I've been guilty of it myself of not always acknowledging the challenges of each particular situation.

Good post. Thanks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a brave thing to get our work looked at for feedback, and many people still don&#8217;t do that.</p>
<p>I agree with your statements about the human angle of usability testing. I&#8217;ve been hearing a lot of feedback from &#8216;client&#8217; teams (i.e. teams receiving the usability report) over the past few years about how much of an attack the usability report tends to seem (even if it was never intended to be an attack). I&#8217;ve been guilty of it myself of not always acknowledging the challenges of each particular situation.</p>
<p>Good post. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Boyd</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2007/being-brave-usability-testing#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 06:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2007/being-brave-usability-testing#comment-779</guid>
		<description>Hi Donna,

I agree :)

The human angle is always important. It can be as important as getting the design right or applying scientific rigour to the testing.

"Tester" or "Usability Evaluator" should never equal "Film Critic".

Cheers, Andrew
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Donna,</p>
<p>I agree <img src='http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
The human angle is always important. It can be as important as getting the design right or applying scientific rigour to the testing.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tester&#8221; or &#8220;Usability Evaluator&#8221; should never equal &#8220;Film Critic&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cheers, Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
