<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As predicted &#8211; Jakob says Ajax sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2005/as-predicted-jakob-says-ajax-sucks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2005/as-predicted-jakob-says-ajax-sucks</link>
	<description>Information architecture, interaction design and much more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:36:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2005/as-predicted-jakob-says-ajax-sucks/comment-page-1#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maadmob.net.s32465.gridserver.com/donna/blog/2005/as-predicted-jakob-says-ajax-sucks#comment-543</guid>
		<description>Not sure there is a &quot;fell for it&quot;. It may be a &quot;spoof&quot;, but the content is a true as the original.

Ajax does suck (almost all of the time).

It is the difference between books and tv for many people - with a book I can turn to any page I like, and I don&#039;t have to keep seeing the annoying popup ads on the &quot;free&quot; tv program (which most people pay $50 a month for...)

I argue that eBay and Google are the prime examples of perfect sites that use &quot;minimal&quot; if any ajax.  AJAX and similar technologies are crutches for poor UI designers.

Understand what the user wants to do, and it is easy to design a far more usable interface with a simple (non AJAX) UI.

Real internet you can bookmark, everything else is just a toy...

Maybe you can spend your energies thinking of shorter text messaging &quot;sentences:.

omgymfass



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure there is a &#8220;fell for it&#8221;. It may be a &#8220;spoof&#8221;, but the content is a true as the original.</p>
<p>Ajax does suck (almost all of the time).</p>
<p>It is the difference between books and tv for many people &#8211; with a book I can turn to any page I like, and I don&#8217;t have to keep seeing the annoying popup ads on the &#8220;free&#8221; tv program (which most people pay $50 a month for&#8230;)</p>
<p>I argue that eBay and Google are the prime examples of perfect sites that use &#8220;minimal&#8221; if any ajax.  AJAX and similar technologies are crutches for poor UI designers.</p>
<p>Understand what the user wants to do, and it is easy to design a far more usable interface with a simple (non AJAX) UI.</p>
<p>Real internet you can bookmark, everything else is just a toy&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe you can spend your energies thinking of shorter text messaging &#8220;sentences:.</p>
<p>omgymfass</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris McEvoy</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2005/as-predicted-jakob-says-ajax-sucks/comment-page-1#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris McEvoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maadmob.net.s32465.gridserver.com/donna/blog/2005/as-predicted-jakob-says-ajax-sucks#comment-542</guid>
		<description>Donna, I&#039;m glad you spotted it was a spoof. I hope that Jakob does publish the real one for comparison.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna, I&#8217;m glad you spotted it was a spoof. I hope that Jakob does publish the real one for comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
