<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many participants?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/how-many-participants/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/how-many-participants</link>
	<description>Information architecture, interaction design and much more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:36:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donna Maurer</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/how-many-participants/comment-page-1#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Maurer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 10:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maadmob.net.s32465.gridserver.com/donna/blog/2004/how-many-participants#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Thanks Richard, that is an excellent article.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Richard, that is an excellent article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Anderson</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/how-many-participants/comment-page-1#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 20:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maadmob.net.s32465.gridserver.com/donna/blog/2004/how-many-participants#comment-302</guid>
		<description>A good article about this: Wixon, D. Evaluating usability methods: Why the current literature fails the practitioner.  interactions, July-August 2003, pp. 29-34. (accessible in ACM&#039;s digital library)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good article about this: Wixon, D. Evaluating usability methods: Why the current literature fails the practitioner.  interactions, July-August 2003, pp. 29-34. (accessible in ACM&#8217;s digital library)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
