<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging - time vs content</title>
	<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content</link>
	<description>Information architecture, interaction design and much more</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jyoti</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>jyoti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-385</guid>
		<description>The common convention is to notate change is to put *Update* in square brackets to let readers know the entry has been modified in some way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The common convention is to notate change is to put *Update* in square brackets to let readers know the entry has been modified in some way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Underwood</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Underwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 02:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-384</guid>
		<description>Boing Boing (http://www.boingboing.com) put "Update" on their posts to cross reference.  Should they make a correction they do not delete what was previously posted, but instead use strikethrough to cross out the incorrect text and then insert the corrected text.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boing Boing (http://www.boingboing.com) put &#8220;Update&#8221; on their posts to cross reference.  Should they make a correction they do not delete what was previously posted, but instead use strikethrough to cross out the incorrect text and then insert the corrected text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maybe</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 04:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-383</guid>
		<description>When I've written a wiki-page related to someone else's blog-entry - Is there a way to "manually" send the blog a trackback that points to the wiki-page?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I&#8217;ve written a wiki-page related to someone else&#8217;s blog-entry - Is there a way to &#8220;manually&#8221; send the blog a trackback that points to the wiki-page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Maurer</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Maurer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys - I'm still thinking about the nature of blogging, future findability, and managing related content, but for now have written a new post and pointed from the old post.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys - I&#8217;m still thinking about the nature of blogging, future findability, and managing related content, but for now have written a new post and pointed from the old post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanderwal</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>vanderwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-381</guid>
		<description>The common convention is to notate change is to put *Update* in square brackets to let readers know the entry has been modified in some way.  After doing this you can put a link to the new entry.   Another option is to put it a comment pointing to the new entry also (it is good to do this inconjunction with the Small Paul suggested method).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The common convention is to notate change is to put *Update* in square brackets to let readers know the entry has been modified in some way.  After doing this you can put a link to the new entry.   Another option is to put it a comment pointing to the new entry also (it is good to do this inconjunction with the Small Paul suggested method).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanni</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 21:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-380</guid>
		<description>I've often used the method described by Small Paul, but I do think that you were right to worry and to ask the question.
It could make an interesting debate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve often used the method described by Small Paul, but I do think that you were right to worry and to ask the question.<br />
It could make an interesting debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Maurer</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Maurer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-379</guid>
		<description>It sounds so simple now...makes me wonder what I was worrying about ;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds so simple now&#8230;makes me wonder what I was worrying about <img src='http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Paul</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-378</guid>
		<description>Why not edit the old blog entry, just adding a simple link to the new blog entry? What would be wrong with that?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not edit the old blog entry, just adding a simple link to the new blog entry? What would be wrong with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhay S. Kushwaha</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhay S. Kushwaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2004/blogging-time-vs-content#comment-377</guid>
		<description>I would update a blog entry only if the date posted is very recent, or if the dicussion in comments is near edit date. Otherwise, I would post a new blog entry and point to my previous entry. Something like:

I have &#60;link&#62;previously written about ACME Machines&#60;/link&#62;. Recently, I've had the chance to look at these in more detail.

[New content here]

Given the nature of the world (best illustrated by your book example), I would then follow up by posting a comment to my previous blog entry: "I've written &#60;link&#62;more about ACME Machines&#60;/link&#62;". This will ensure anybody who comes to the old post also finds a way to the new content.

[a]
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would update a blog entry only if the date posted is very recent, or if the dicussion in comments is near edit date. Otherwise, I would post a new blog entry and point to my previous entry. Something like:</p>
<p>I have &lt;link&gt;previously written about ACME Machines&lt;/link&gt;. Recently, I&#8217;ve had the chance to look at these in more detail.</p>
<p>[New content here]</p>
<p>Given the nature of the world (best illustrated by your book example), I would then follow up by posting a comment to my previous blog entry: &#8220;I&#8217;ve written &lt;link&gt;more about ACME Machines&lt;/link&gt;&#8221;. This will ensure anybody who comes to the old post also finds a way to the new content.</p>
<p>[a]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
