<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designing for invisibility</title>
	<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2003/designing-for-invisibility</link>
	<description>Information architecture, interaction design and much more</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Krieger</title>
		<link>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2003/designing-for-invisibility#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>David Krieger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/2003/designing-for-invisibility#comment-162</guid>
		<description>In my work as a developer, I have noted another common disconnect between users and developers: Developers tend to value generalization - discovering and implementing general routines that address common pieces of many different scenarios. On the other hand, users always think in terms of the specific - the specific tasks they need in order to accomplish their work. As I reflect on this a little more, it seems a slightly different perspective on your original observation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my work as a developer, I have noted another common disconnect between users and developers: Developers tend to value generalization - discovering and implementing general routines that address common pieces of many different scenarios. On the other hand, users always think in terms of the specific - the specific tasks they need in order to accomplish their work. As I reflect on this a little more, it seems a slightly different perspective on your original observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
